Thank you Dennis for promoting change. A couple questions have been asked here before, but since you're current on the issues, maybe you know. For starters, why are the guidelines even written by the judicial branch? The mere fact that the same judges who enforce or interpret the guidelines in cases of an appeal are the same ones approving them. Why is this okay? Wouldn't it make more sense for the guidelines to be part of the legislative process? Another thing that seems to be consistently brushed under the rug is the issue of term limits on committee members. Why have some committee members been sitting on the committee for the past 30 years? There were apparently hundreds of people lining up to sit on the committee in 2012, yet only a handful were allowed to displace those stepping down. The guidelines have probably remained the same for a number of years because it's the same group of people approving them year after year. Have you ever talked about term limits with the committee?
