Agreed. However, the responsibility for filing for review of Child Support Orders currently legally falls upon the parties (parents). This is a legally correct position and so it would seem that when one child ages out of the system or exits by emancipation that child's portion of the support would be automatically deducted from the standing order leaving the remaining portion(s) to be paid. It is the party desiring a modification who must file a request for hearing on the matter of a Child Support Modification for the Court to consider the most current financial, residential and Child Support Guidelines circumstances.
I believe it would be nice for the parties (parents) if the Child Support Committee would recommend a standard Court procedure for review, notification for review, etc. But, it would not necessarily be legally correct for them to force this upon the Courts.
This can become a complicated process as it is my understanding that the legal power to modify any Child Support Order resides with the District Court Judge and has not been given to a lower level Court Magistrate Judge or the Trustees office. Caution need be taken in making such a recommendation for automatic review based upon the number of cases that would be forced into a review process with a hearing thus potentially increasing the case load of the District Court Judges to a level impossible to manage responsibly.
On the other hand..... If the Court Trustees office is not just dropping off one child's portion of the support and is instead re calculating support based upon information from the old Child Support Order (age, income, etc) and using the most recent guidelines to determine a new amount of support under the authority of the District Court Judges than this would appear to be a most urgent matter for the Child Support Committee to address.