Kansas Child Support Forum

Kansas Case Management, LCM, and Mediation => General Discussions => Topic started by: Deemer on May 26, 2016, 04:10:06 PM

Title: Question Regarding Request for Discovery
Post by: Deemer on May 26, 2016, 04:10:06 PM
So now that alimony payments are ending, the x had her attorney send me a Request for Documentation asking for a number of different things to include retirement/investments/titles/bank accounts/w-2's/tax returns for the past 2-3 years.  Much of this includes financial information of my current wife.  I am pro se.  My question is:

Do I have to respond to this letter? if so..

Can I object to this?  If so...

What is the proper procedure?



Background:  I filed for modification a couple years back since they originally garnished my wages on a Washington DC salary of 100k.  We moved back before the divorce where I continued working remotely (still receiving that salary for 3 months).  At the time of divorce I was MAYBE making 60k.  So, I provided all my stuff trying to prove that I could not afford to live with the $$ I was ordered to pay, and the court agreed to make the modification. 

Fast forward to now.  Alimony payments are stopping and out of the blue,  I get this letter from her attorney.   Any advice would be amazing..

Thanks.
Title: Re: Question Regarding Request for Discovery
Post by: dalaw on May 27, 2016, 02:39:20 PM
The letter you are receiving is typical.  When alimony ends, there is a large change in the child support amount.  Child support is based on income though, and not retirement and investments.  Child support is also based on employment and income that was "historically relied upon" to support the family.  This means if you have additional employment income now, the court does not have to consider that.  You are allowed to obtain additional employment or make additional money to try to meet your child support obligations.  I will tell you, you'll have to make that very clear to the court though because some judges fail to remember that part of the guidelines.

Discovery matters are complicated and require things to be done on a certain time line.  I can give you some basic help, but you might want to consider hiring an attorney.  Both parents are required by the guidelines to provide proof of their current income one another.  To reiterate, that's both parents.  Make sure you request the same of your ex.  This request is not a filed request, but can count against you.  If you do not provide, the other party "might" ask for attorney fees to request it through the court.  The other party is fishing for income because their motion will be to modify child support - trust me on that.

What you might consider doing at this point is sending a copy of your last couple pay stubs and request the same of your ex.  Income, not taxes, are what is required by the guidelines.  From that point, the other party will file a request for production.  This will give you 30 days to provide certain things.  They may also subpoena your employer for your income.

You can object to the request, but I would advise that you just provide the income proof.  If this were a filed request for production or subpoena of business records to a 3rd party, you could object and let the court decide the admissibility.  If you want to object, all that is needed by Kansas law is to send written notice of objection to the other attorney.  I recommend doing so via certified mail return receipt.  They will then file a motion to have the court decide
Title: Re: Question Regarding Request for Discovery
Post by: Deemer on June 07, 2016, 03:02:05 PM
Sorry for the late reply.  Thank you so much for your advice. A discovery was never done to begin with.  I could not and still cannot afford representation so I'm trying to do this all on my own.  Like I said, its been 2 years since I filed for modification of support and won.  Now alimony is ending, she is pulling this.  Again, thank you for the words of advice. A couple more questions.

Do I need to give reasons to object for everything  I am not disclosing? Is there a specific verbiage other than: I object to this request? 
Do they need to give a reason to why they need the last 3 years of bank statements etc..?

This is my plan.

Provide W-2's and Tax returns for the past 3 years
Object to Title Documents/Retirement/Bank Statements
Let a judge decide what other information is required. 

Hope for the best as this woman has drained every penny and ounce of life from me.

Title: Re: Question Regarding Request for Discovery
Post by: Guru on June 10, 2016, 05:59:41 PM
I'll try to help.

Yes you need to have reasons for the objections.  A hearing will be held to decide whether your objections are founded.  The law states that if you object, you need not provide the information until further order of the court.  Check KSA 60-245 for subpoenas.  I can't remember which one covers the discovery process.  You can object and say the request is an undue burden and you can also request payment for the copying.  You do not need to provide the records until that payment is satisfied.

Just keep in mind that child support does not depend on assets.  So, you can probably object to documents proving assets on that basis.  There's no reason for the other party to have them.

What I have done is objected just like you are proposing.  The judge then ordered that the extensive amount of data (like my employment application) be provided.  What I did after the judge allowed all the information, was went home and drafted subpoenas exactly like the other party and even asked for a few more things.  I got everything I wanted because I had a court order telling me it was okay.

Discovery is a broad topic and there are many things that can be discovered if they are relevant to the case.  The other party needs to prove they have some relevance.  You need to prove they are not relevant.  When you provide written objections to the attorney, just go to the court house and file that letter with the court to let them know you have objected.  Provide the attorney with a file-stamped copy.  I've been pro se for a very long time.  Attention to detail keeps attorneys from catching you in a technicality because many do not like dealing with pro se litigants.